 |
| Madame Bovary |
Flaubert spent five years writing Madame Bovary, agonizing over sentences until they achieved the precision he required, and the precision is the first thing you notice: a clear, cold, faintly pitiless clarity that illuminates Emma Bovary without ever quite forgiving her or condemning her. The narrative eye has all the emotional temperature of a very good scientific instrument.
Emma is a doctor's wife in provincial Normandy who believes, with the conviction of someone who has read too many second-rate romances, that she was made for a grander existence than the one she occupies. Her husband, Charles, is kind and dull and loves her with a steadiness she experiences as suffocation. The drawing rooms of Yonville are not glamorous. The neighbors are not interesting. Emma is trapped — but trapped by what, exactly? The novel is precise about this too: partly by circumstance, partly by the specific quality of her own imagination, which has been formed on fantasies that cannot survive contact with the actual.
She takes lovers. Rodolphe is charming and knows he is charming and uses that knowledge without apology. Léon is younger, more malleable, more romantic in his own imagination — and equally inadequate, for different reasons. Each relationship begins with the electric possibility of transformation and gradually reveals itself as just another room in the same provincial house. Emma keeps expecting feeling to be more than it is, and feeling keeps being exactly what it is.
The financial catastrophe that underpins the novel's second half arrives through Lheureux, the draper-cum-moneylender who appears early and waits patiently at the periphery while Emma's desperation grows into something he can use. This plot element is sometimes treated as merely material, but it is the novel's most honest metaphor: Emma's desires have always exceeded her resources, in every sense.
What Flaubert refuses to do is laugh at Emma, though the temptation must have existed. Her romanticism is provincial and borrowed and ultimately destructive, and yet the longing underneath it — for beauty, for intensity, for a life that matches the scale of feeling — is not itself contemptible. The novel holds this in suspension: she is foolish, and the foolishness is a form of suffering.
Madame Bovary established the template for the modern realist novel, and the technical achievement deserves acknowledgment — but the more lasting thing is what Flaubert did with the material. He wrote a tragedy about a woman whose inner life was entirely real to her, in a world that offered her almost no legitimate outlet for it, and he did not blink.
Get Madame Bovary
Post a Comment